Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Now that I've retired from FFC

Yes, I've officially retired from Flash Fiction Chronicles which I helped to found back in 2009--March 22 as a matter of fact--with the help and encouragement of Every Day Fiction whose editors, Jordan Lapp, Camille Gooderham Campbell, and Steven Smethurst, wanted to create a place for EDF writers to discuss the craft of Flash Fiction. I volunteered to "co-ordinate."  Sarah Hilary contributed our very first article, "Historical Flash--(Re)living the Moment."

What I quickly learned, however, was that most fiction writers want to write fiction, not essays on how to create compelling characters with a phrase or two.  I was thrilled to discover that once asked, writers are more than happy to share their expertise.  I would list all our contributors here, but after four years and an average of four articles a week, there are way too many, and I'm afraid I'll leave someone out.  You can go HERE to find them. 

In April, 2009, I tried to define what I thought Flash Fiction could be.

From Flash Fiction Chronicles, April 9, 2009

In her essay in The Best of Every Day Fiction, editor extraordinaire and slush mistress Camille Gooderham Campbell writes, "Despite its appeal as a quick read, flash fiction is not simplistic. Quite the opposite; it can and should be one of the most demanding literary forms, with a need for perfectly crafted prose, a complete story arc in a tight space, and an immediately engaging hook."

As I read submissions in the slush pile at Every Day Fiction, I realize that many writers do not have an understand of what flash fiction is. Camille's definition is a great place to start.
Gay Degani is the editor of  Every Day Fiction's new blog, Flash Fiction Chronicles.  


Flash is not some accidentally thrown together words that seem to flow through a writer's fingers without much thought. Yes, it's true that some writers are skilled enough, and/or gifted enough to not have to edit very much, maybe even just proofread, but believe me, that's not me and I'd take any bet that that isn't most of you out there.
  • Flash is not a prose poem. * 
  • It’s not a vengeful spew about killing someone without developing character and complexity.
  • It’s not an extended paragraph used to set up a punch line.
  • It’s not an anecdote-slice-of-life-guess-what-happened-when-I walked-out-to-get-the-newspaper-the-sun-was-blinding-and-I-tripped.
  • It’s not an article, sermon, op-ed piece.
  • It’s not an obituary-like report on someone’s life.


Good flash is governed by the same reader expectation as any other fiction writing. Check Aristotle. Check Robert McKee. Check Chris Vogler. Heck, go read the bliss man, Joseph Campbell. Readers expect certain things and Camille tells you what they are: a hook, a story arc, and strong prose.

I want to add on more thing, good flash like all good writing should have some point to make, a reason for being that somehow, in small or large way, reveals a universal truth, a moment that brings to the reader a smile, a laugh, a tear, a "Yep, ain't that just the way life is."

So when thinking about writing flash, it would be helpful to keep in mind some of the words and phrases that should apply to any piece of flash:
  • surprising, fresh, original, intriguing, new
  • compelling content, unique situation, interesting choices made by characters  
  • anchored by time and place 
  • has conflict, has tension, active protagonist, action not activity, complexity not complication, delivers an ending that is unexpected but inevitable
  • precise language, clear distinct voice, specific detail

Words you don’t want associated with your flash:
bland, mundane, vague, trite, dashed off, trickery, passive, predictable, nothing happens, no sense of place, unclear, not cohesive.

* I may or may not agree with this any more