Fighting Writer's BACK...

One of the many things most writers have in common—besides juggling time, getting blocked, finding a publisher—are the aches and pains that come from sitting at a computer for hours. Here's some help from my friend and trainer, Estelle Underwood, certified personal trainer, owner of Bodyworks for Total Health in South Pasadena, California, and creator of the BodyWorksBand!  This article is reprinted from The Huffington Post with permission from the author.

Don't Just Sit There - Take a Stand

by Estelle Underwood

We've all heard too many times that a sedentary lifestyle is hazardous to our health. Many of us who take the risks of this type of lifestyle seriously have incorporated a weekly, if not daily, exercise routine into our busy schedules. So we've got it covered, right? Wrong. Even if you engage in a routine workout program on a daily basis, but you sit for the greater part of the day, you are at risk.

I know, I'm always showing up with "good news," bursting your bubble about all your good health habits. But as you'll see, I do have good news, and it is crucial that you continue your regular workout routine. However, there is more that you can do to facilitate disease prevention and increase the quality of your life. First, let's understand the problem.

In large part due to technological advances and the Internet, we have become far more sedentary than generations before us. We live electronically -- that is, we pay bills, shop and many of us even do our jobs online. We have remote controls for everything -- televisions, garage doors, video games. Think of how many forms of entertainment you engage in that allow you to sit without ever standing up, which lead you to become physically inactive. Add to that the fact that we now use social media to visit with our families and friends, and you can just begin to see that we in large part live our lives sitting down -- not standing up. So all these advancements that we enjoy, making our lives easier, are in fact making us sick and potentially shortening our lifespan. Not desirable.

The problem is that as human beings, our bodies are designed to stand upright and to move. That's why we have bone joints -- you know, those areas of your body that seem to lock up and ache every morning when you try to get out of bed! They are meant to move. When we sit for prolonged periods of time, we put ourselves at risk for developing poor posture, knee pain, herniated discs and other back and neck problems. These are very common problems -- ones that I see in my fitness studio on a regular basis. I have a client who is a writer, working from home at her computer for much of the day. Last year she developed an extremely painful sciatica problem for which she is still undergoing physical therapy. Though she was facing the possibility of surgery, her condition has greatly improved as she has been routinely doing exercises to re-strengthen the muscles that became weak and could no longer support her spine after years of sitting. Most important, she is now setting a timer to go off at least every 20-30 minutes to remind her to get up from her chair -- a simple solution that could have spared her a lot of pain and medical expense had she done it sooner.

Biomechanical problems are not the only risk of sitting. According to Marc Hamilton, Ph.D., associate professor of biomedical sciences at the University of Missouri, prolonged sitting tends to slow down your metabolic system. Processes that break down metabolic sugars and fats in the blood are disrupted, wreaking havoc with our cholesterol levels. This is not news. We know that if we are sedentary for long periods of time, our muscles cease to move and circulation slows down, causing a decrease in the consumption of calories. The result is weight gain and an increase in body fat, which set us up for developing serious diseases. Dr. Hamilton tells us that the rates of cardiovascular heart disease, diabetes and obesity are doubled or sometimes even tripled in people who sit a lot. I don't know about you, but these statistics frighten me!

In case all these health risks are not enough to get you out of your chair, consider this. In 2011, USA Today reported that more than 90,000 new cancer cases a year in the United States might be due to physical inactivity and prolonged periods of sitting. So now we can add cancer to that list of risks. This is getting really scary, don't you think? The good news is that we do have some control over this situation -- and the solutions are simpler than you might think.

Recently I was reading an article in the January-February 2012 issue of the AARP Bulletin, entitled "Sitting: Hazardous to Your Health." (By the way, you don't have to be THAT old to subscribe to AARP!) The article quoted Dr. Alpa Patel, senior epidemiologist with the American Cancer Society, as saying that "if you reduce sitting by five minutes an hour, at the end of a long day, you've shaved an hour of your total sitting time."

More research done by Neville Owen, Ph.D. of Australia's Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, suggests that the longer you sit, the higher your risk, but this risk can be significantly lowered by simply taking breaks from sitting for even one minute at a time. One minute at a time! That's not a lot. And all you actually have to do is stand up. That's right, even just standing up every 15 to 20 minutes will possibly decrease your risk of getting a life-threatening disease. And another benefit to standing is improvement of your HDL or good cholesterol levels. According to our friend Dr. Hamilton, people who sat too long reduced their good cholesterol levels by 22 percent! If that isn't incentive enough, I know this one will get your attention. Standing actually helps shrink your waistline. Dr. Hamilton reports that the average person can burn an extra 60 calories an hour just by standing! Sounds good to me.

Recently I heard about a woman who had a work desk built over her treadmill! This enables her to stand up and even walk slowly while she's on her computer, talking on the phone, etc. That may seem extreme, but it's one creative way of dealing with this problem. If you're not ready for that, think about getting a stability ball chair to replace your desk chair. I'm sitting on one now as I write this article. This is what we call "active sitting." My core muscles are forced to work to keep me on the ball. It also keeps me in alignment -- and I've got to tell you, it's much more comfortable than any desk chair I've ever had. By the way, in case you're wondering, I have stood up numerous times during the course of this writing.

Other suggestions I might make are to keep your printer in a different room than where your computer is so that you have to stand up to go get your document. Drink lots of water while you're working (which you should be doing anyway, right?) so that you have to go use the restroom frequently. Like my client with the sciatica problem, get yourself a timer and set it for every 15 to 20 minutes to remind you to stand up. The point is to arrange your life so that you shorten the periods of time in which you are sitting.

Hopefully, this information has captured your attention. You now have knowledge and tools to be proactive in the prevention of disease and discomfort. So continue on with those daily exercise routines, but remember that's not enough. "Stand up" and fight for good health, quality of life and longevity! You deserve nothing less.

For more by Estelle Underwood, click here.

Follow Estelle Underwood on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@bodyworksband

KIRKUS Gives Me Very Little Love

My Kirkus review for What Came Before is in and though I seriously considered not publishing it (when you pay $400 dollars for a review, they kindly let you opt-out of having it available to the reading public), I owe it to myself and others to share it.  Doesn't everyone get lousy reviews?

I remember some old black-and-white movie in which a director, the producers, and actors gather in a restaurant (Sardi's?) waiting for the newspaper reviews after the debut of their play.  All About Eve comes to mind, but maybe not.

Anyway, reviews, it is posited, can make or break a play, a movie, a book. As creative people, we think we need them and we think what we've done may be good enough for a good review, but not every piece of work will appeal to everyone. The question is, should a review hurt our chances of success?

I don't think so.  I hope not.

How many times have I read in the Los Angeles Times that this movie or that movie is a transcendental experience or a piece of garbage, and after seeing said movie wonder, what the hell?  To use a cliche (a writing flaw my anonymous critic accuses me of), beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

I just read the other day that curriculum honchos in schools in England have dropped Of Mice and Men and To Kill a Mockingbird from required reading lists. The Huffington Post has tried to make us writers feel better by publishing in 2012 "Bad Reviews of Great Authors."  Here are a couple of examples:

"Wuthering Heights" by Emily Bronte

"There is not in the entire dramatis persona, a single character which is not utterly hateful or thoroughly contemptible."

- Atlas, 1848

"The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald

"no more than a glorified anecdote, and not too probable at that... Only Gatsby himself genuinely lives and breathes. The rest are mere marionettes—oftenastonishingly lifelike, but nevertheless not quite alive."

- H.L. Mencken, Baltimore Evening Sun, 1925

"Lolita" by Vladimir Nabokov

"Unfortunately, it is bad news. There are two equally serious reasons why it isn't worth any adult reader's attention. The first is that it is dull, dull, dull in a pretentious, florid and archly fatuous fashion. The second is that it is repulsive."

LET ME BE CLEAR!  I am in no way claiming my little book is anything like the books we commonly love and admire.  However, what I am saying is that although there are some valid points to my critic's analysis (occasional cliches, clues too easy, lacking "gravitas"), it seems to me that he/she hasn't given me much credit for the things some of my readers believe I did accomplish.  "Unsatisfying" I think is the word that struck me as NOT the common experience.

There are a couple hints in the review that perhaps it has some merit, but none proffered without a "but," an "although," "that said," or "nevertheless," making it difficult to use the good bits without feeling as if I'm cheating.

So here's the link to the KIRKUS REVIEW.  Although reading it may discourage a read or two, but if you want to give What Came Before a chance--and hopefully see for yourself if you like it--it's still online FREE online, all seventy chapters at EVERY DAY NOVELS.

And yes, if you agree or disagree with the review, Kirkus allows for comments.

You can also purchase it for KINDLE or in a gift edition hardback at AMAZON.com or BN.com.  Trade paperback is coming soon. Other ebook options at Tomely.

In Jayne's World, we have to write...

Jayne Martin offers up a challenge this morning to get us writing after the long weekend.  (There was a weekend?)  

Per Jayne:

The challenge:  Write a story (beginning, middle and end) that hints at a larger story, but is complete within itself, in 25 words or less.  The most famous piece of hint fiction was written by Hemingway:
            For sale:  Baby Shoes.  Never worn.
Hint Fiction demands reader involvement.  “Why were the baby shoes never worn?” we’re left to contemplate.   It hints at much more, yet is complete in and of itself. 

Write your story on your own blog, then come back here and link up your post.  Be sure and visit everyone else’s offering and support your fellow writers with a comment.  If you don’t have a blog, you may leave your story in my comment section below.  Write and post as many as you want.   Link-up will be active through June 1st.  
Have fun!

Want to know more about hint fiction?   Visit Robert Swartwood's Hint Fiction website by clicking here. 

Here's mine:

Second Thought

Smelly toes, phlegmy cough, blanket hog. Where's dinner? he mumbles, shuffling in.  Eyes meet. He strokes my cheek. Memories swirl. Arsenic in my pocket weighs.

Join the fun.  Write your own, visit her site, and "link up:" HERE

Coach Your Story Like Your Name is Erik Spoelstra

This article is reprinted from Flash Fiction Chronicles. It appeared during the NBA play-offs in 2012. I don't remember which game it was--maybe game 5?--II wanted to post it again since we just may have another Heat v. Thunder play-off.

What a terrific game.  I just hope the Thunder can come back so the series goes to seven.  Nothing like great basketball to get me thinking about teamwork and how it applies to writing. The writer is the coach.  The team: each member is a story element and they must work together to WIN.   (Indulge me here.  Everything seems like a metaphor for writing to me!)

Think about it.  The coach is the one who teaches, guides, plans, shapes, and has a heart attack when all the teaching, guiding, planning, shaping doesn’t work.  The team has potential, it may even have talent, but if left to their own devices, the members might play well, might even be brilliant, but going all the way, reaching for that trophy?

The big man might not let the others play because he never gives up the ball.  The point guard might try to get everyone to pay attention, to work the ball around to the player with the best “look,” but maybe there’s a bumping battle for position in the key and the player misses the pass.   You’ve heard it before from the master himself, Michael Jordan,  ”Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”  And whose job is it to bring teamwork and intelligence to the court?  The coach.

So how does that apply to writing?  You guessed it, the author is the coach.  He or she is the person in charge, the one who makes the tough decisions, who inspires, motivates, and keeps everything on track.  The starting team includes structure, language, content, theme, and characters with dialogue, setting, clarity, metaphor, and imagery coming off the bench.

The coach puts his first team on the court.  The best players, but he has to switch them out when something isn’t working and he has a strong bench to do so.  Maybe for one story, language is the focus–the element that never lets the author down,  for another, structure, but no matter what strategy the coach decides will work, he has to count on all the elements to do their part.

I love Blake Griffin.  Watched him in the NCAA championships and there was something about him that stood out (damn good basketball) and I remembered him, so when he ended up on the Clippers, I was excited.  We went to a couple games and the Clippers suddenly had enough  talent that we dared to hope they would be contenders, but they didn’t always play as a team.  Whoever had the ball tended to shoot.  There was little working around the floor and while Chris Paul and Blake Griffin might be two of the most talented players in basketball, they could not bring it in the end without the rest of the team.

The same is true in putting together a story.  An author might be brilliant with words, stringing them together like easy lay-ups, but a story needs more than pretty words.  It has to have meaning.  It has to stir something in the reader.  Occasionally, of course, an imagery-rich story might be enough, something there beneath the lines that works for many readers, but we’re talking about the long haul here, making it to the finals, to the championship. Sharp original language is like having a superb big man.  You might win over fans for a few stories, but at some point, the  author needs to send in the rest of the team.

Language, structure, and content need to work together and still have room for the other elements to play their part in order for a writer to produce championship work.  Writing is like coaching.  You can’t just put your best two players in the game and hope they can bring home the  NBA Trophy while you cheer them on.   You need to coach everyone on the team.  You need to get each one to contribute the best version of their skills to the play.

If you saw the game last night, important plays were made by bench-warmers Nick Collison for the Thunder and Norris Cole for the Heat.  And what about Mario Chalmers?  We expect to be cheering Dwyane Wade and LeBron, but Bosh?  And while Russell Westbrook scored a valiant 32 points, the Thunder lost because yes, late in the game, his team ran out of gas.

So enough of this.  You get the point. We writers need to consider how all the elements of a story can contribute to the overall story and while one or the other may dominate, it is the contributions from the bench that will often carry the day.

Podcast Interview-Robert Swartwood Asks Me About WCB

Robert Swartwood, the USA Today bestselling author of The Serial Killer's Wife, The Calling, and Man of Wax asks some good questions about What Came Before including how serialization of the novel came about.  The podcast is available at his website HERE.

Robert’s  work has appeared in The Los Angeles Review, The Daily Beast,  Postscripts,  ChiZine, Space and Time, Wigleaf, and PANK. He created the term “hint fiction” and is the editor of Hint Fiction: An Anthology of Stories in 25 Words or Fewer. He lives with his wife in Pennsylvania.

Chapter 1 of What Came Before Read by Me

Have your been wondering about Chapter 1 of my suspense novel?  Here's a taste of What Came Before!  

Available for purchase in hardcover at Amazon (http://amzn.to/PEQhhy) or B&N (http://bit.ly/1gxuJcr) or read the serialized version here:  http://everydaynovels.com/whatcamebefore/chapters/1/

About What Came Before:

Fed up with being tied down by twenty-five years of domestic bliss and everyone's expectations, Abbie Palmer, struggling to find her creative self and asserting some independence from her husband, moves into the Tiki Palms. When he tells her, "You'll be lonely. No man is an island," she flings back, "That's exactly what I want to be, an island. I'm sick of being a whole continent." But breaking away isn't so easy, what with cops, Molotov cocktails and Hollywood starlets, lost memories -- and maybe an unknown half-sister...

What Came Before in the World

Although the official launch date for What Came Before hardcover gift edition is Monday, April 7, both Barnes and Noble and Amazon have it posted for sale on their respective sites.  You can also read it online at Every Day Novels.

How What Came Before Came to Be

What Came Before was conceived as a comedy with lots of broad humor and exaggerated characters, but as I began to work, I realized I needed to write about something I cared about, that there had to be a reason beyond car chases for a piece of writing to exist. I rethought the whole thing, asking myself, what would be interesting to me, important for me to say. Stories--good stories--had to be about something that mattered, either to me and/or to others.

In the beginning, Abbie's missing half-sister was white, like Abbie and like me, and I kept running up against my own question, "so what?" “Where’s the tension?”  I reached into my own life, my own experiences, my own childhood.

I grew up in California, but my mom came from a little town in Louisiana and my dad from Iowa.  Since my dad was a teacher, we climbed into our old Pontiac as soon as school was out and headed east to corn country, then down to Terrebonne parish.  That’s where I ran smack dab into Jim Crow laws.

I loved going to the grocery store with my grandpa.  He was a sunburned Santa Claus who smelled of figs and cigars, filling our cart with rolls and rolls of toilet paper, paper towels, cans of tomato sauce and bottles of soda pop.  I liked to hold onto the front and ride while he pushed through the aisle. Then at some point when I was four or five – I don’t really remember exactly when – he let me go in search of a drink of water by myself.

I stood in front of two water fountains instead of one wondering which one I wanted. I’d never had a choice like this before.  Not in California. 

One was labeled “white” and one was labeled “colored.”  What would most little kids chose? I chose “colored,” of course, because to my mind that meant the water would come out like a rainbow: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, purple. When it didn’t, I was disappointed. I tried the white one. The two sprays of water were exactly the same.  I was confused and angry.

I ran back to my grandpa. He said one was for white people, the other was for "colored" people. When I asked why, he just shrugged. I don’t remember for sure, but I think it was my father who explained it to me, that this kind of thing existed in the world.

And I wish I could say I knew instinctively at that young age the wrongness of it, but I didn’t. It’s something I have learned as I’ve grown into myself, through reading, through the experiences of the growing up in the fifties and sixties, through watching the news filled with civil rights marches, the Watts riots, and assassinations (MLK, Medgar Evers, Malcom X), how human beings tend to exist in a real world. “What Came Before” springs from a desire to show that people are more alike than different and that our differences enrich us. 

We are Twenty-One Chapters Into What Came Before

That's right. WCB has been up at Every Day Novels now for four weeks, moving into week five.  And if you don't know what I'm talking about it's my serialized suspense novel at Every Day Novels.  It's free through the entire book, but just so you know, once it's over, it will be removed from the internet and only be available in a hardback gift edition, paperback, and e-book formats.

What Came Before is the story of Abbie Palmer who decides once her children are gone, she's going to take a break from her husband to pursue creative endeavors - just for the summer, a kind of personal-growth camp.  Her head is about to burst with everything she wants to do, paint, write, make jewelry, knit, reupholster furniture.  She even has an old electric fry pan tucked under the marriage bed with large blocks of beeswax.  She wants to learn how to batik!

Her husband rolls his eyes and keeps coming up with other things they have to do, she has to do, so she decides to take a "leave of absence" from her marriage, but just when she settles into her tiny apartment at the Tiki Palms, she runs into murder, cops, and repressed memories from her past.

Anyway, I don't want to give away too much.  I want you to read the book on the edge of your seat which some readers have told me they've been doing.  If you haven't started reading yet, here's the link: WCB

Hard Cover Due April 7

And there's more news.  Every Day Novels editor and publisher, Camille Gooderham Campbell, has told me the hardback edition of WCB will available for purchase on April 7!!!!  If any of you reading this live in the Los Angeles area and would like me to visit your book group or if you'd like to get some friends together to party, contact me at gaydegani@gmail.com.  I'm happy to come, read some of the story, and talk about the novel and/or about writing itself.

This Time I'm Starting the Game

Susan Tepper tagged me in a recent merry-blog-go-round about writing process, but having been tagged by someone else I decided to come up with new questions and I thought it would be interesting to ask writers about their characters.  This came out of a discussion at FFC’s New and Emerging Writers Group which focuses on the art and craft of writing.  The discussion question, posed by Jim Harrington, FFC’s Managing Editor, was, “How do you select character names?” I want to expand on that, so here are some new questions for writers who want to play along.  I’ll start with my own answers.

1). What surprises you about your characters? And why?

I’m always surprised that they show up because I rarely begin a story with a character in mind. Usually I begin with a situation and then just GO.  I suppose this means they come out similar to me, especially if I start with a first person narrative and that makes sense because the situation—if told from the “I” viewpoint usually resembles something I’ve been through.  The third person pops up if the situation isn’t that close to home.  I’m surprised I just admitted that. 

2). What do you draw upon to create your characters?

Of course as with most writers, I pull my characters from myself, from people I know, and from people I observe, but rarely have I ever consciously created a character from a single person.  I remember one case where the character is exactly like real life but the details are changed.  Other than that, most of the time my characters spring from what I know—or think I know—then evolve with the story as I make decisions—or I’m led toward decisions.  This is where it gets a little loopy, the chicken and the egg syndrome.

3). Out of all of the characters you’ve created, who is your favorite and why? Please name the story and supply a link if that’s possible.

Right now it’s Abbie Palmer who is the main character of my suspense novel, What Came Before.  She is a lot like me in so many ways, but certainly she has been molded to fit the story.  There is a reason why I don’t do memoir because my own life has been extremely ordinary and satisfying. This is not what good drama is made of.  Another favorite who is alive now in Pure Slush’s 2014-A Year in Stories anthologies is Sybil.  She a landlady who has managed her life fairly well but there’s something in her past that she’s dealing with, and her ability to be everyone’s go-to person is slipping away.

4) Are there any characters you are not quite done with yet?  What other challenges do you want to give him or her?

I have two published short-stories about Nikki Hyland, Slacker Detective.  I would like to write a few more shorts or even a novel continuing to challenge her to get her you-know-what together.  Her first story can be found in LandMarked for Murder along with several other stories from members of the Los Angeles chapter of Sisters-in-Crime.

5). How do you select character names?

Sometimes names just pop into my mind and sometimes I research, looking for subtly suggestive, as in the case of Sybil, the landlady I mentioned before.  I wanted her to have an old fashioned name to suggest her age and her wisdom.  I haven’t quite used this allusion to its fullest yet and I may not.  I don’t ever want names to be obvious, but rather to hint at something deeper. This though doesn’t always happen.  Sometimes a name is just a name. 

Who am I going to tag?  Susan Tepper, Nate Tower, and H.L. Nelson

Tagged-My Writing Process

“My Writing Process” is a series of blog posts in which authors ‘tag’ each other to answer questions about their work. Stephen V. Ramey asked meto take part, along with Jamie Lackey.

Stephen is an American author of contemporary and speculative fiction. His short stories and flash fictions have appeared in dozens of venues from Microliterature to Daily Science Fiction. His first collection, Glass Animals, is available from Pure Slush Books.

So here are the questions:

What am I working on?

My suspense novel, What Came Before, has just been released online at Every Day Novels. A lot of work went into getting it ready first for online and then for print, but I think that phase is coming to a close.  Now I'm in promotion mode. 

However, I do have a second exciting project that I am still deeply involved with and that's Pure Slush's 2014-A Year in Stories.  This is a monster project!  I'm participating with 30 other writers. The brainchild of Matt Potter at Pure Slush out of Australia and requires each of us to write a story for one specific day a month for all the days of 2014. 

The umbrella title for my twelve stories is "The Old Road," but each one is a separate piece about people who live in this particular neighborhood on the edge of a small city. 

What we’re publishing is a series of stories from each writer that arcs across the whole year, involving the same character or set of characters. Twelve days in the life of that person or people. So every month, as the books are released, readers can dip into these characters’ lives. Like a serial.

How does my work differ from others of its genre?

In most of my work, people die.  That happens in suspense, mystery, science fiction, lit, and humor and I’ve dabble in all of them.  One thing I try to do regardless of genre is to try and make the reader feel as if she’s immersed in the story, the characters, and the setting.  I want to feel almost as if they are watching a movie.  Sometimes I get it right, other times, not so much.

Why do I write what I do?

When I was a kid and spending most of my time reading, I would sometimes draw a picture of the spines of books with their titles in different colors, with different kinds of handwriting (no computer fonts to fake it with in those days) and these were all the books I was going to write.

How does my writing process work?

I write every day and I commit to a lot of projects: contests, writing groups, ideas that are juicy over a period time.  I keep track of these projects using my sticky notes with deadlines in bold.  This way I always have something I can open when I grab a few minutes.  When I have something that is burning to get free or just as powerful something I’ve promised to someone, I attack those first. 

The way I work is force myself to do something a project every day or even several times a day.  I believe that—just like with crossword puzzles or jigsaw puzzles—there are advantages to stepping away from whatever I’m doing so that when I come back, I always find some easy to do.  A misspelled or left out word, awkward language, something that jumps out and then I’m off with a fresh mindset working away.

I am tagging Christopher Allen and Robert Vaughan.

Christopher Allen is an expat, gluten-free, photo-literary travel(b)logue writer.  His fiction and creative non-fiction have appeared in many places over the last few years. Links to these publications are at I Must Be Off!

Robert Vaughan leads writing roundtables at Redoak Writing in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He’s won several awards, He was former fiction editor at Thunderclap! and is senior flash fiction editor at JMWW. Find out more about his publications at robert-vaughan.com/.

The Tribe of Us

by me and reblogged from Valarie Kinney's Organizing Chaos and Other Misadventures

In February, I spent the five days in the beautiful city of Seattle experiencing what community really is. I’m not talking about Pike’s Market--though charming with its wealth of tulips in buckets, its yellow-clad fish mongers, and yummy fish tacos--nor am I talking about the city’s juxtaposition of old and new, the brick and arches of the Corner Market flanked by sleek Washington scrapers as seen from the Ferris wheel.

 No, I’m talking people, those writers who come from all over the world like Christopher Allen from Munich and May-Lan Tan from London as well as from every part of the U.S. including San Diego’s Bonnie ZoBell or Staunton Virginia’s Clifford Garstang. There are so many more I could name who’ve helped create a virtual community out of the ether and know what the word “kinship” means.

What brought us together this week—in real life—was the Association of Writers and Writing Programs. AWP hosts a conference in a different U.S. city every year, and I’ve been lucky enough to travel to two of them, Boston in 2013 and Seattle this year. There were over a rumored 12,000 writers who braved snow-bound airports to come to this Pacific Northwest city and the lime green ribbons worn by each reminded me that we are a tribe of artists and teachers and students who love the written form. For me, it’s been an opportunity to meet writers I know from the various online communities such as Zoetrope, Fictionaut, and Facebook.

Why is this important? If you write, you know. Slumping over a laptop until the sun yawns over the horizon can be a lonely business and often loved ones can’t figure out why a warm quilt and a soft bed aren’t as important as pounding out words until your fingers ache. But 12,000 writers en masse understand. And those who take the time to tap out encouragement to you on Facebook or offer you thoughtful critiques of your work at Zoe, they are your compadres, your soul mates, your honest evaluators, who keep you focused on your intention: to put out the best work you can.

The planners and executors who work behind the scenes of conferences like AWP’s deserve applause for bringing in people like Annie Proulx and Ursula Le Guin so we can learn from masters and for coordinating the panels that increase our skills and artistry. I appreciate all of you, and thank you for your efforts. Even more, for me, and I suspect for most, the precious jewel in this is just being with and surrounded by the word people—publishers, editors, and writers, new, emerging, established and those exploding wide open.

Kathy Fish Talks about Writing and Together We Can Bury It

 This is a reprint from an interview I had with Kathy Fish for Flash Fiction Chronicles, published June 6, 2012.

One of the first names I heard when I discovered Flash Fiction was “Kathy Fish,” and I’m delighted to have the opportunity to interview her about her newest collection, Together We Can Bury It.

Gay Degani: Your stories are clear-eyed and lyrical with characters that provoke curiosity and concern. It’s easy to make a connection to them, their humanity, their strength, and their frailty. But there’s something else, something I find most intriguing about your writing.

Your work is subtle and sometimes the “meaning” seems just outside my reach—until I read the story again. Each new look produces a fresh nuance and I can't quite figure out how you create something that circles back on itself the way "Swicks Rule" or "Baby, Baby" "Orlando" or "Maidenhead to Oxford" or "Moth Woman” do, and still satisfy the reader so thoroughly? How do you break the "rules" we take so seriously?

Kathy Fish: Thanks so much for the kind words, Gay. You're asking such an interesting question here. I've had to ponder this a little. 

The simplest answer I can give is that the way I write is the way I think. I've always stayed pretty loyal to the voices in my head or rather, the sound in my head. I hear a certain rhythm to a narrative and plug in words and images to fit that rhythm. This is especially true of first sentences and paragraphs. 

Imagery takes over after sound and I just layer image upon image and somehow in that process, something like a narrative emerges. I guess when you put sound and imagery first, rather than plot and characterization, you're going to break a few rules. I know what the rules are and I know I'm breaking them, but it feels right to me, so I trust it. 

And that's not to say I don't revise. I just don't revise to fit the rules, I revise to get it closer to how I hear and see it in my head. 

As to making it work, I think there's something to be said for staying true to your own style and voice. There's a certain authenticity to that. Also, I realize it probably doesn't work for every reader, but I'm very grateful there are readers for whom it does work. 

GD: What about the "voices" in your head? Most writers experience this, but often discover "voice" only takes them so far, but I see in your response you've developed a process that goes beyond voice. When you say, "I revise to get closer to how I hear and see it in my head," what questions do you ask yourself?

KF: There is always that voice asking me, "Why are you writing this?" that I have to try to shut out. Confidence, as a writer, is not so much always feeling like your instincts are right, but doubting them and writing anyway.

I think process is ever changing, for all of us and what works now may not work later, but it helps to have an approach to writing fiction and that's my approach. My road blocks in the beginning had to do with not knowing my own voice and trying out all kinds of other writers' voices. I suspect that's how we all start, like learning to speak, it's all about imitation. Also, there was the self-doubt that had me changing tenses and POVs compulsively. I still do that, but not like I used to.

When I revise, I read the story aloud, over and over again. Almost always I will find myself stumbling in the same places and it's usually where I've overwritten or gone off-voice. Flow and rhythm are huge for me and where a story is lacking in those becomes really obvious when it's spoken. I think it does take practice and lots of trial and error.

GD: Your work has a lyrical beauty to it that must come from this technique of reading your work aloud. I see it especially in your opening sentences. You say "Flow and rhythm are huge for me and where a story is lacking in those becomes really obvious when it's spoken."

I love sentences like "I stand hugging my light sweater around me on Platform 6 at Maidenhead Station." Or from "My boyfriend and I grab our bikes and pedal across town for a parade that has probably been cancelled." ("Tenderoni")

Or "It was like the time we broke icicles dripping from the low eaves and brandished them like swords, slashing and sparkling, and you cut my cheek and dropped your weapon." ("Watermelon")

Or my favorite: "My twin cousins, Margie and Mae, are manning the grill, telling me about their diverticulitis." ("Swicks Rule")

You do more with these opening sentences than seduce the reader with rhythm. You promise something else is in store for the reader.  The way you work is to "get closer" to what you hear in your head. Is this how structure evolves for you?

KF: I think a mosaic structure is a means of reining in stream of consciousness writing. Thoughts and images and language shifts from section to section rather than sentence to sentence or word to word. Meaning emerges from how the sections are ordered, emphasis, etc. I like using it when it feels right for the story. 

GD: “Mosaic structure” doesn’t seem easy to pull off, yet you manage to do so time after time. Can we talk a little bit about pulling this collection together? You've created section in your book using lines from one of the stories in each section. What were your guiding thoughts?

KF: Pulling the collection and ordering the stories was very difficult. My stories are all over the place in terms of theme, point of view, and style. I envy writers who write all their stories in first person, for example. And write stories that are semi-autobiographical. There you already have one voice, a unifying theme, a sense of cohesion. I just don't do that. My narrators are not "me" and so there are all these disparate voices. 

But some themes do run through my stories with consistency and that was our starting point. Molly Gaudry, who runs The Lit Pub, was extremely helpful with this task. She gave me lots of intuitive and intelligent feedback as to how the stories felt to her. She also noticed how the stories seemed to weave in an out of the seasons of the year and also, the seasons of one's life: childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. This gave us a starting point and we started grouping the stories this way. I also wanted to begin and end on "wintry" stories so that the book resonated with the stunning cover art by Jana Vukovic.

I pulled sentences or phrases from the stories to introduce the different sections of the book. I felt those phrases gave a good sense, emotionally, of the stories for their sections. I wanted each section to feel like a mini collection in its own right. It took a long time to get it just right but I think we were successful. I am very happy with how the collection reads and flows and the overall feel of it. 

GD: You've been a pioneer in the genre of flash. What advice would you give new and emerging writers about writing in general and writing flash in particular?

KF: That is a very kind thing to say, Gay, thank you. My advice for new, emerging writers:

1. Work hard. 

2. Actually have something to say. Maybe you will have to do a lot of thinking to figure out what you want to say. Thinking takes time and you might be in a hurry to get published, but there is enough trite bullshit in the world. You're better than that. 

3. Read read read read read. Read only what excites you. Don't read, ever, out of a sense of obligation. Read what inspires and challenges you. Fall in love with stories and books and other writers. They're your true teachers. 

You can purchase Kathy's book at the Lit Pub store HERE.

Kathy Fish’s short fiction has appeared in Indiana Review, The Denver Quarterly, New South, Quick Fiction, Guernica, Slice and elsewhere. She was the guest editor of Dzanc Books’ Best of the Web 2010.  She is the author of three collections of short fiction: a chapbook of flash fiction in the chapbook collective, A Peculiar Feeling of Restlessness: Four Chapbooks of Short Short Fiction by Four Women (Rose Metal Press, 2008), Wild Life (Matter Press, 2011) and Together We Can Bury It, the 2nd printing of which is forthcoming from The Lit Pub.

What Came Before, my serialized novel, is Launched!!

I can't believe this is actually happening!!  I'm flying high (both literally right now on Alaska Airlines in a Boeing 737) and metaphorically too.  My suspense novel, What Came Before, is being serialized on-line beginning today and continuing through seventy 1000-word chapters.  Eventually you will be able to purchase it in paperback or in kindle and e-book format, but you can get started right now.

Please, if you have time, check it out and spread the word.

Here's a link to find out more.

Here's the link to begin reading.

Here's what readers have to say about What Came Before:

"What Came Before is a remarkable achievement." ~ Clifford Garstang

"Fast-paced and sharply written, with unforgettable characters, this novel by Gay Degani will grab hold and not let go." ~ Kathy Fish

"What Came Before is a fast-paced murder mystery set in the heart and spirit of L.A." ~ Tara Laskowski

"Do not sit down to read this with only a few minutes. You won't want to put this stunner down." ~ Bonnie ZoBell

Racial tension, an unexplained sibling, a fire, and plenty more action make this a page-turner. ~ Susan Tepper

"I can't think of an afternoon spent so energetically without moving an inch from my armchair!" ~ RKBiswas

"A brilliant and complex whodunit with a memorable, imperfect character at its helm." ~ Christopher Allen

"What Comes Before, Gay Degani's debut novel rumbles along at break-neck speed." ~ K.C. Ball

"Part murder mystery, part family saga, Gay Degani's What Came Before is an exciting debut not to be missed!" ~ Robert Swartwood

  ARTWORK © 2013 AINI TOLONEN

Surrounded by Water by Stefanie Freele, A Review

Stefanie Freele’s collection, Surrounded by Water, contains stories with strong, often lyrical, language and believable, down-to-earth characters, each piece, a reading experience.  It’s her women I am drawn to.  They’re tough.  In “Over the Rolling Waters Go,” the creeping reality of a wife and mother is juxtaposed against the peppy gung-ho spirit of her husband and his idea of family dynamic.  What seems at first blush to be an innocent virtue turns out to be bullying very quickly.  The suspense builds and…I won’t talk about the ending. 

Another mother, in the short but totally satisfying, “If the Unsuitable Neighbor Smells Snow,” shows her own fierce determination. 

“A Bunch of Cash Landed my Way” brings us humorous wishful thinking and “The Problem of Pillows” illustrates Ms. Freele’s deft touch at dialogue. For example, when a student runs into professor with the instincts of a sybil.

“You again,” she [the professor] says without glancing my way.  “You’re not locked in the Bermuda Triangle.” This is stated like a professorial fact, one she may test me on next Tuesday. 

I check my person and confirm I’m not locked anywhere; but as always, I’m intrigued by mention of the Bermuda Triangle, a place you may enter, but gamble on an exit.  I respond, “I’m free to come and go.”

The professor predicts the student will need a new pillow and because the prof has been right in the past, and the old pillow is one of “procrastination,” the student runs out and buys a new one, “a down one, filled with pluckings from once-warm bodies.”  One of my favorite lines in the story is “All of my unfinished business lies upon that pillow, snuggles along its two-hundred thread count loveliness.”  

Wonderful combination of image and meaning and this kind of language can be found throughout. 

And then there is “While Surrounded by Water,” for which the collection has been named.  I’m tempted to call it a “flash novel” because though it is the length of a short story, the content is as gratifying as a much longer work with characters in crisis coming to grips with who they are.  Once again there is a strong, tough woman at its center, one who is underappreciated but full of life and determination.  This seems to be a theme in Ms. Freele’s work.  Quiet triumphs over what life dishes out. 

Published by Press 53 out of Winston-Salem, North Carolina, with gorgeous cover designed by Kevin Morgan Watson and art by Dariusz Klimczak, Surrounded by Water is a collection worthy of a large appreciative audience.  

Storm Interview, Me and Gloria Garfunkel : Pure Slush's 2014- A Year in Stories

Gloria Garfunkel interviews me about my story cycle for Pure Slush's 2014 A Year in Stories.* 

Gay Degani 
The Storm
January 20 2014 
Interview by Gloria Garfunkel 

There’s no doubt about it, this is the Gothic opening of a creepy tale. How did you decide to start with the point of view of a distant narrator and then switch to that of the protagonist, Jamie. 

 I’m not sure this was a conscious decision, but rather what occurred to me as I thought about how to sustain a group of stories that would arc over the entire year. I realized I had to create something to entice readers to come back and the stranger showed up on the screen when I first sat down to write. When I began this project, I knew I wanted to use the creek and some 1920’s bungalows I pass by on my walks in the late afternoon. It can get rather eerie along the Arroyo and I found these elements compelling. I also knew creating a neighborhood would allow me a variety of interconnected characters, but who they would be, I didn’t know. Who was the stranger? I didn’t know that either. 

Do you like Gothic tales and movies and if so, what are your favorite? 

It’s funny that you cast this as Gothic. I hadn’t thought about this project as anything but suspense, but it makes perfect sense to me. I realize now how inevitable it is that I would write in this way. I’ve been an avid lifetime reader of Gothic romances (no vampires or werewolves, please, just brick up the wife in the wall of the manse). 

From my first Mary Stewart and Victoria Holt novels to the Brontes and Daphne DuMaurier, I’ve never tired of them. I even wrote my dissertation on feminism in Gothic romances of the 19th century. 

What do you think are the Gothic elements in this first story and were they all intentional or did some just creep in? 

Although I would answer this question “they just crept in,” it is obvious years of reading these kinds of stories has had its influence on me. What could be more Gothic than angry nature? And wind! Night! A heroine who feels threatened and takes action? A dark stranger? A seemingly interested male? I just realized too, that though they live in the bungalows, there’s a deserted mansion next door! Wow. 

Discounting what happens later, does the hero, the stranger Mars who is the son of Mr. German, give you the creeps like he does me? 

I wanted Mars to be unsettling and suspicious. I want the reader to wonder about him so I made him aggressive with his attentions. Creating tension is the only way I know to get people to move on to the next story. 

Is the Gothic element just an opening scene or does the story proceed to a Gothic ending? Don’t tell me, but I hope Jamie’s kids are safe. 

My goal has always been to have mystery in this story. As I said before, I hadn’t really thought of it in terms of labels, so I hadn’t considered a “gothic” ending. In Jane Eyre and Rebecca, fire destroys Thornfield and Manderlay respectively. Both Mr. Rochester and Maxim de Winter are ruined men, but their women are faithful. I’ll have to think about this. You’ve opened up a door here, Gloria. The ending is, as yet, unwritten.

You can read interviews by Gloria Garfunkel with other authors participating in Pure Slush's 2014-A Year in Stories here: http://pureslush.webs.com/gginterviews.htm#931986546


*Pure Slush’s big project for 2014 is under way. It’s a multi-volume anthology called 2014, it includes 12 volumes, each volume devoted to a month of the year, and therefore named January Vol. 1, February Vol. 2, etc.

Each writer involved is contributing one story per month ... so 12 stories in all, from 28 of the 31 writers involved. (11 from two of them, and 7 from the last.)

And each of these writers is taking one day of each month - the 5th, the 13th, the 21st, for example - and setting his / her stories on that same day of every month.

So, for example, a writer takes the 10th – Friday 10th January, Monday 10th February, Monday 10th March, Thursday 10th April, etc – throughout the year.

What we’re publishing is a series of stories from each writer that arcs across the whole year, involving the same character or set of characters. Twelve days in the life of that person or people. So every month, as the books are released, readers can dip into these characters’ lives. Like a serial.

Each volume is being released (in print and eBooks) a month or more before the start of each month in 2014 ... so readers can read a story a day, in real time.

Written in the present tense, these stories can be read as if they are happening NOW ... which if the reader chooses to read one per day, will be like experiencing these characters in real time.

All the days of the month were assigned to writers who said yes, I want to be involved, put my name against a date! ... and you can check out who they are by clicking here.

Sunday Flash

mint
science
video
feline
god 

55 words

The Faithful 

Video cameras around the Washington Mint are gods to the feline population along 9th Street. They gather to pray several times a day when a high priest makes his rounds dropping sardines at each surveillance point. No rhyme or reason to this ritual, but cats never question religion or science.